Home / Projects / Orchestrata Ultimate / Decisions / ADR index / ADR-0049
ADR-0049: Adversarial-review evidence is repo-committed and enriches wiki + graph
| field | value |
|---|---|
| Status | Proposed — Proposed (awaiting Mohamed; the repo home is already executed as data |
| Date | 2026-08-29 |
| Register | factory (docs/adr, 4-digit ids) |
| Source | docs/adr/0049-review-evidence-three-homes.md — permalink at 9c90c0209 (unchanged on master since that commit) |
| Wiki register entry | ADR-0049 (wiki status: Proposed) |
The record
Status: Proposed (awaiting Mohamed; the repo home is already executed as data rescue — reversible, and volatile /tmp was the alternative) · Date: 2026-08-29
Context
Mohamed asked of round-16 data: "where is it documented? does it enrich the knowledge graph? does it enrich the wiki?" Honest state when asked: the design's §12 ledger, the status doc, and all agent briefs were committed, but the 39 full evidence files (two lens reports per round, every fold-verifier report) lived ONLY in the volatile session scratchpad, and nothing from the review stream reached the wiki or the graph.
Decision (proposed)
Three homes for review evidence, mirroring ADR-0046's decisions rule:
(1) REPO — every round's reports + verifier files committed to plans/reviews/
Alternatives rejected
Scratchpad-only (volatile — the state Mohamed caught); repo-only (invisible to graph queries and wiki readers — the exact gap ADR-0046 closed for decisions).
Consequences
Review evidence becomes durable, citable, retrievable; each round's fold routine gains two mechanical steps (wiki index append + semantic ingest).
Provenance
Mohamed's questions, decision session 2026-08-29; backfill commit 3e6eb9c5; ADR-0046 precedent.
Related ADRs
- Also mentioned: ADR-0046
Rulings cited
None.
Specs cited
None (or no spec page exists for the ones named).