Orchestrata Ultimate › Research › Cut-over review

Cut-over review and test re-point measurement

Question How can the components cut-over be done faster, and how much of the test and script tree can move off orchestrata_ultimate mechanically?
Method Read only, 2026-10-22. Sources: the cut-over plan (wt-COMPONENTS/packages/integration/increments/README.md); the design files in packages/integration/design/ (design, clean-target, decisions, spec-125-delta, boundary-census); the component DAG; ADR-0113, ADR-0115 and ADR-0116. The measurement used the 6-root AST snapshot (wt-COMPONENTS plans/ast-ultimate.json), the lift grammar (grammar.json) and the files that actually landed in packages/
Status Findings recorded. Not acted on: no briefs written, no codemod built. Two follow-ups were ruled on 2026-10-22 and published as ADR-0127 and the ADR-0124 addendum (below)

The plan as recorded

Cut-over review findings

  1. The plan predates the wave tool. The 8 upstream packages landed through component_wave.py and land_component.py. Volks, for example, landed 286 modules in 44 s with 0 model tokens and 43 residue items. The integration plan instead assumes 24 separate per-increment dispatches. Their briefs are not written yet (increments/ holds only the README), and there is no packages/integration/.realize-out.
  2. Half the plan is test tooling. INT-12 to INT-22 are 3,741 of the 7,136 lines (52%). The frozen snapshot e57782ea4 is stale for run_tests.py: 11 commits since have changed it by +566/−69 lines. ha_controller_cli (185 lines, in INT-22) is runtime code and stays in the release.
  3. Two gates are stale records. N4 and N-I1 were APPROVED under AD-65 R3 (boundary-census.md lines 15–26 and 52), but the README and decisions.md still list them as gates.
  4. Five CLI arrivals have no increment. The 5 AD-65 R3 CLI arrivals have no INT increment: ask_openrouter, e2e_run, graph_query, scan_implementation and generate_rtm_evidence.
  5. Removing the old tree is not in the plan. In the 6-root snapshot, 1,596 of 2,091 test modules and 100 of 181 scripts import orchestrata_ultimate.

Test re-point measurement

The question here: if every import orchestrata_ultimate.X were rewritten to the package that now holds X, how many files would resolve?

Tree Import orchestrata_ultimate All imports resolve by same module path At least one import does not resolve
tests/ 1,596 modules 360 1,236
scripts/ 100 13 87

"Resolves" means that a module at the same dotted path exists in the grammar's landed package.

Why most do not resolve. The landed packages moved modules:

In all, 476 grammar modules have no file at the same path in any package: tools 112, kernel 102, contracts 73, session 55, kg 47, gateway 46 and governance 40. tools/src has 28 files against 120 grammar modules, because many of them were transferred to codetools.

No frozen-to-landed symbol map exists on disk. design.ir.json has no origin field. The mapping exists only inside fill_pkg's re-point logic. The next step is for a worker to build that map as an artifact. The re-point codemod would be built on top of it.

Other buckets:

Diagram projects-orchestrata-ultimate-research-cutover-review-and-test-repoint-1

Rulings that came out of the review (2026-10-22)

Both were published at the ADR publish step on 2026-10-23 (ADR-0130).

What would make it faster

This list comes from the findings. It is a recommendation, not a ruling.

  1. Run integration through the same wave tooling the eight packages used, instead of 24 hand-briefed dispatches.
  2. Fix the two stale gate records so that INT-04 and INT-11 stop looking blocked.
  3. Add increments for the five CLI arrivals, plus one for removing the old tree.
  4. Build the frozen-to-landed symbol map first. Every re-point depends on it.

All four depend on the open packages/ ruling (ADR-0132, Proposed); see Python deployment best practices.